Chapter 7
|
Project Cost Management
|
Project Cost Management
includes the processes required to ensure that the
|
project
is completed within the approved budget.
Figure 7-1 provides an overview
|
of
the following major processes:
|
7
|
.
|
1
|
Resource Planning
|
—determining what resources (people,
equipment, mate-
|
rials) and what quantities of each should
be used to perform project activities.
|
7.2 Cost Estimating
|
—developing an approximation (estimate) of
the costs of the
|
resources needed to complete project activities.
|
7.3 Cost Budgeting
|
—allocating the overall cost estimate to
individual work activities.
|
7.4 Cost Control
|
—controlling changes to the project
budget.
|
These processes
interact with each other and with the processes in the other
|
knowledge
areas as well. Each process may involve effort from one or more indi-
|
viduals or groups of
individuals, based on the needs of the project. Each process
|
generally occurs at
least once in every project phase.
|
Although
the processes are presented here as discrete elements with well-
|
defined
interfaces, in practice they may overlap and interact in ways not detailed
|
here. Process
interactions are discussed in detail in Chapter 3.
|
Project
cost management is primarily concerned with the cost of the resources
|
needed
to complete project activities. However, project cost management should
|
also
consider the effect of project decisions on the cost of using the project’s
|
product.
For example, limiting the number of design reviews may reduce the cost
|
of
the project at the expense of an increase in the customer’s operating costs.
This
|
broader
view of project cost management is often called life-cycle costing . Life-
|
cycle
costing together with Value Engineering techniques are used to reduce cost
|
and time, improve
quality and performance, and optimize the decision-making.
|
In many application
areas, predicting and analyzing the prospective financial
|
performance of the
project’s product is done outside the project. In others (e.g.,
|
capital
facilities projects), project cost management also includes this work.
|
When such predictions
and analyses are included, project cost management will
|
include
additional processes and numerous general management techniques such
|
as return on
investment, discounted cash flow, payback analysis, and others.
|
Project
cost management should consider the information needs of the project
|
stakeholders—different
stakeholders may measure project costs in different ways
|
and
at different times. For example, the cost of a procurement item may be mea-
|
sured
when committed, ordered, delivered, incurred, or recorded for accounting
|
purposes.
|
|
PROJECT COST
|
MANAGEMENT
|
7.2
|
Cost Estimating
|
7.3
|
Cost Budgeting
|
7.1
|
.1
|
Inputs
|
.2
|
Tools and Techniques
|
.3
|
Outputs
|
.1
|
Work breakdown
|
structure
|
.2
|
Historical information
|
.3
|
Scope statement
|
.4
|
Resource pool
|
description
|
.5
|
Organizational policies
|
.6
|
Activity duration
|
estimates
|
.1
|
Expert judgment
|
.2
|
Alternatives identification
|
.3
|
Project management
|
software
|
.1
|
Resource requirements
|
.1
|
Inputs
|
.2
|
Tools and Techniques
|
.3
|
Outputs
|
.1
|
Work breakdown
|
structure
|
.2
|
Resource requirements
|
.3
|
Resource rates
|
.4
|
Activity duration estimates
|
.5
|
Estimating publications
|
.6
|
Historical information
|
.7
|
Chart of accounts
|
.1
|
Analogous estimating
|
.2
|
Parametric modeling
|
.3
|
Bottom-up estimating
|
.4
|
Computerized tools
|
.5
|
Other cost estimating
|
methods
|
.1
|
Cost estimates
|
.2
|
Supporting detail
|
.3
|
Cost management plan
|
.8
|
Risks
|
.1
|
Inputs
|
.2
|
Tools and Techniques
|
.3
|
Outputs
|
.1
|
Cost estimates
|
.2
|
Work breakdown
|
structure
|
.3
|
Project schedule
|
.4
|
Risk management plan
|
.1
|
Cost budgeting tools
|
and techniques
|
.1
|
Cost baseline
|
Resource Planning
|
7.4
|
.1
|
Inputs
|
.2
|
Tools and Techniques
|
.3
|
Outputs
|
.1
|
Cost baseline
|
.2
|
Performance reports
|
.3
|
Change requests
|
.4
|
Cost management plan
|
.1
|
Cost change control
|
system
|
.2
|
Performance
|
measurement
|
.3
|
Earned value
|
management (EVM)
|
.4
|
Additional planning
|
.5
|
Computerized tools
|
.1
|
Revised cost estimates
|
.2
|
Budget updates
|
.3
|
Corrective action
|
.4
|
Estimate at completion
|
.5
|
Project closeout
|
.6
|
Lessons learned
|
Cost Control
|
When
project costs are used as a component of a reward and recognition
|
system
(discussed in Section 9.3.2.3), controllable and uncontrollable costs
|
should
be estimated and budgeted separately to ensure that rewards reflect
|
actual performance.
|
On
some projects, especially smaller ones, resource planning, cost estimating,
|
and cost budgeting are
so tightly linked that they are viewed as a single process
|
(e.g.,
they may be performed by a single individual over a relatively short period
|
of
time). They are presented here as distinct processes because the tools and
|
techniques
for each are different. The ability to influence cost is greatest at the
|
early
stages of the project, and this is why early scope definition is critical, as
well
|
as thorough
requirements identification and execution of a sound plan.
|
7.1 RESOURCE PLANNING
|
Resource
planning involves determining what physical resources (people, equip-
|
ment,
materials) and what quantities of each should be used and when they
|
would
be needed to perform project activities. It must be closely coordinated
|
with cost estimating
(described in Section 7.2). For example:
|
ٱ
|
A
construction project team will need to be familiar with local building codes.
|
Such knowledge is often
readily available from local sellers. However, if the
|
local
labor pool lacks experience with unusual or specialized construction
|
techniques,
the additional cost for a consultant might be the most effective
|
way to secure knowledge
of the local building codes.
|
ٱ
|
An
automotive design team should be familiar with the latest in automated
|
assembly techniques.
The requisite knowledge might be obtained by hiring a
|
consultant,
by sending a designer to a seminar on robotics, or by including
|
someone from
manufacturing as a member of the team.
|
7.1.1 Inputs to Resource
Planning
|
.
|
1
|
Work breakdown structure.
|
The
work breakdown structure (WBS, described in
|
Section 5.3.3.1)
identifies the project deliverables and processes that will need
|
resources, and thus is
the primary input to resource planning. Any relevant out-
|
puts from other
planning processes should be provided through the WBS to
|
ensure proper control.
|
.
|
2
|
Historical information.
|
Historical information
regarding what types of resources
|
were required for
similar work on previous projects should be used if available.
|
.1
|
.2
|
.3
|
.4
|
.5
|
.6
|
Work breakdown structure
|
Historical information
|
Scope statement
|
Resource pool description
|
Organizational policies
|
Activity duration estimates
|
.1
|
.2
|
.3
|
Expert judgment
|
Alternatives identification
|
Project management
|
software
|
.1
|
Resource requirements
|
Inputs
|
Tools & Techniques
|
Outputs
|
.
|
3
|
Scope statement.
|
The scope statement
(described in Section 5.2.3.1) contains
|
the project justification
and the project objectives, both of which should be con-
|
sidered explicitly
during resource planning.
|
.
|
4
|
Resource pool description.
|
Knowledge
of what resources (people, equipment, mate-
|
rial)
are potentially available is necessary for resource planning. The amount of
|
detail
and the level of specificity of the resource pool description will vary. For
|
example,
during the early phases of an engineering design project, the pool may
|
include
“junior and senior engineers” in large numbers. During later phases of the
|
same
project, however, the pool may be limited to those individuals who are knowl-
|
edgeable
about the project as a result of having worked on the earlier phases.
|
.
|
5
|
Organizational policies.
|
The
policies of the performing organization regarding
|
staffing
and the rental or purchase of supplies and equipment must be considered
|
during resource
planning.
|
.
|
6
|
Activity duration estimates.
|
Time durations
(described in Section 6.3.3.1).
|
7.1.2 Tools and Techniques for
Resource Planning
|
.
|
1
|
Expert judgment.
|
Expert judgment will
often be required to assess the inputs to
|
this
process. Such expertise may be provided by any group or individual with spe-
|
cialized knowledge or
training, and is available from many sources including:
|
ٱ
|
Other units within the
performing organization.
|
ٱ
|
Consultants.
|
ٱ
|
Professional and
technical associations.
|
ٱ
|
Industry groups.
|
.
|
2
|
Alternatives identification.
|
Alternatives
identification is discussed in Section 5.2.2.3.
|
.
|
3
|
Project management software.
|
Project
management software has the capability to
|
help
organize resource pools. Depending upon the sophistication of the software,
|
resource
availabilities and rates can be defined, as well as resource calendars.
|
7.1.3 Outputs from Resource
Planning
|
.
|
1
|
Resource requirements.
|
The
output of the resource planning process is a description
|
of
what types of resources are required and in what quantities for each element
at
|
the
lowest level of the WBS. Resource requirements for higher levels within the
|
WBS
can be calculated based on the lower-level values. These resources will be
|
obtained
either through staff acquisition (described in Section 9.2) or procurement
|
(described
in Chapter 12).
|
7.2 COST ESTIMATING
|
Cost estimating
involves developing an approximation (estimate) of the costs of
|
the
resources needed to complete project activities. In approximating cost, the
|
estimator considers the
causes of variation of the final estimate for purposes of
|
better managing the
project.
|
When
a project is performed under contract, care should be taken to distinguish
|
cost
estimating from pricing. Cost estimating involves developing an assessment of
|
the
likely quantitative result—how much will it cost the performing organization
|
to provide the product
or service involved? Pricing is a business decision—how
|
much
will the performing organization charge for the product or service—that uses
|
the
cost estimate as but one consideration of many.
|
Cost estimating
includes identifying and considering various costing alterna-
|
tives.
For example, in most application areas, additional work during a design
|
phase
is widely held to have the potential for reducing the cost of the production
|
phase.
The cost-estimating process must consider whether the cost of the addi-
|
tional design work will
be offset by the expected savings.
|
7.2.1 Inputs to Cost Estimating
|
.
|
1
|
Work breakdown structure.
|
The
WBS is described in Section 5.3.3.1. It is used to orga-
|
nize
the cost estimates and to ensure that all identified work has been estimated.
|
.
|
2
|
Resource requirements.
|
Resource
requirements are described in Section 7.1.3.1.
|
.
|
3
|
Resource rates.
|
The individual or group
preparing the estimates must know the
|
unit
rates (e.g., staff cost per hour, bulk material cost per cubic yard) for each
|
resource to calculate
project costs. If actual rates are not known, the rates them-
|
selves may have to be
estimated.
|
.
|
4
|
Activity duration estimates.
|
Activity
duration estimates (described in Section 6.3.3.1)
|
will
affect cost estimates on any project where the project budget includes an
|
allowance
for the cost of financing (i.e., interest charges).
|
.
|
5
|
Estimating publications.
|
Commercially available
data on cost estimating.
|
.
|
6
|
Historical information.
|
Information
on the cost of many categories of resources is
|
often available from
one or more of the following sources:
|
ٱ
|
Project
files—one or more of the organizations involved in the project may
|
maintain
records of previous project results that are detailed enough to aid in
|
developing
cost estimates. In some application areas, individual team mem-
|
bers may maintain such
records.
|
ٱ
|
Commercial
cost-estimating databases—historical information is often avail-
|
able commercially.
|
ٱ
|
Project
team knowledge—the individual members of the project team may
|
remember
previous actuals or estimates. While such recollections may be
|
useful, they are
generally far less reliable than documented results.
|
.
|
7
|
Chart of accounts.
|
A
chart of accounts describes the coding structure used by the
|
performing organization
to report financial information in its general ledger.
|
Project cost estimates
must be assigned to the correct accounting category.
|
.
|
8
|
Risks.
|
The project team
considers information on risks (see Section 11.2.3.1)
|
when producing cost
estimates, since risks (either threats or opportunities) can
|
have
a significant impact on cost. The project team considers the extent to which
|
the
effect of risk is included in the cost estimates for each activity.
|
.1
|
.2
|
.3
|
.4
|
.5
|
.6
|
.7
|
.8
|
Work breakdown
structure
|
Resource requirements
|
Resource rates
|
Activity duration estimates
|
Estimating
publications
|
Historical
information
|
Chart of accounts
|
Risks
|
.1
|
.2
|
.3
|
.4
|
.5
|
Analogous estimating
|
Parametric modeling
|
Bottom-up estimating
|
Computerized tools
|
Other cost estimating
|
methods
|
.1
|
.2
|
.3
|
Cost estimates
|
Supporting detail
|
Cost management plan
|
Inputs
|
Tools & Techniques
|
Outputs
|
7.2.2 Tools and Techniques for
Cost Estimating
|
.
|
1
|
Analogous estimating.
|
Analogous estimating,
also called top-down estimating ,
|
means
using the actual cost of a previous, similar project as the basis for esti-
|
mating
the cost of the current project. It is frequently used to estimate total
|
project
costs when there is a limited amount of detailed information about the
|
project
(e.g., in the early phases). Analogous estimating is a form of expert judg-
|
ment (described in
Section 7.1.2.1).
|
Analogous
estimating is generally less costly than other techniques, but it is
|
also generally less accurate.
It is most reliable when a) the previous projects are
|
similar
in fact and not just in appearance, and b) the individuals or groups
|
preparing the estimates
have the needed expertise.
|
.
|
2
|
Parametric modeling.
|
Parametric modeling
involves using project characteristics
|
(parameters)
in a mathematical model to predict project costs. Models may be
|
simple (residential
home construction will cost a certain amount per square foot
|
of living space) or
complex (one model of software development costs uses thir-
|
teen separate
adjustment factors, each of which has five to seven points on it).
|
Both the cost and
accuracy of parametric models vary widely. They are most
|
likely
to be reliable when a) the historical information used to develop the model
|
was accurate, b) the
parameters used in the model are readily quantifiable, and
|
c)
the model is scalable (i.e., it works as well for a very large project as for
a very
|
small one).
|
.
|
3
|
Bottom-up estimating.
|
This technique involves
estimating the cost of individual
|
activities or work
packages, then summarizing or rolling up the individual esti-
|
mates to get a project
total.
|
The cost and accuracy
of bottom-up estimating is driven by the size and com-
|
plexity
of the individual activity or work package: smaller activities increase both
|
cost
and accuracy of the estimating process. The project management team must
|
weigh the additional
accuracy against the additional cost.
|
.
|
4
|
Computerized tools.
|
Computerized tools,
such as project management software
|
spreadsheets and
simulation/statistical tools, are widely used to assist with cost
|
estimating. Such
products can simplify the use of the tools described earlier and
|
thereby facilitate
rapid consideration of many costing alternatives.
|
.
|
5
|
Other cost estimating methods.
|
For example, vendor bid
analysis.
|
7.2.3 Outputs from Cost
Estimating
|
.
|
1
|
Cost estimates.
|
Cost
estimates are quantitative assessments of the likely costs of
|
the resources required
to complete project activities. They may be presented in
|
summary or in detail.
|
Costs must be estimated
for all resources that will be charged to the project.
|
This includes, but is
not limited to, labor, materials, supplies, and special cate-
|
gories such as an
inflation allowance or cost reserve.
|
Cost
estimates are generally expressed in units of currency (dollars, euros,
|
yen,
etc.) to facilitate comparisons both within and across projects. In some
cases,
|
the estimator may use
units of measure to estimate cost, such as staff hours or
|
staff days, along with
their cost estimates to facilitate appropriate management
|
control.
Cost estimating generally includes considering appropriate risk response
|
planning, such as
contingency plans.
|
Cost
estimates may benefit from being refined during the course of the project
|
to
reflect the additional detail available. In some application areas, there are
|
guidelines for when
such refinements should be made and what degree of accu-
|
racy
is expected. For example, The Association for the Advancement of Cost Engi-
|
neering
(AACE) International has identified a progression of five types of
|
estimates of
construction costs during engineering: order of magnitude, concep-
|
tual, preliminary,
definitive, and control.
|
.
|
2
|
Supporting detail.
|
Supporting detail for
the cost estimates should include:
|
ٱ
|
A description of the
scope of work estimated. This is often provided by a ref-
|
erence to the WBS.
|
ٱ
|
Documentation of the
basis for the estimate; i.e., how it was developed.
|
ٱ
|
Documentation of any
assumptions made.
|
ٱ
|
An
indication of the range of possible results; for example, $10,000 ± $1,000
|
to indicate that the
item is expected to cost between $9,000 and $11,000.
|
The
amount and type of additional details vary by application area. Retaining
|
even
rough notes may prove valuable by providing a better understanding of how
|
the estimate was
developed.
|
.
|
3
|
Cost management plan.
|
The
cost management plan describes how cost variances
|
will
be managed (e.g., different responses to major problems than to minor
|
ones).
A cost management plan may be formal or informal, highly detailed or
|
broadly
framed, based on the needs of the project stakeholders. It is a subsidiary
|
element of the project
plan (discussed in Section 4.1.3.1).
|
7.3 COST BUDGETING
|
Cost
budgeting involves allocating the overall cost estimates to individual
activi-
|
ties or work packages
to establish a cost baseline for measuring project perfor-
|
mance. Reality may
dictate that estimates are done after budgetary approval is
|
provided,
but estimates should be done prior to budget request wherever possible.
|
7.3.1 Inputs to Cost Budgeting
|
.
|
1
|
Cost estimates.
|
Cost estimates are
described in Section 7.2.3.1.
|
.
|
2
|
Work breakdown structure.
|
The
WBS (described in Section 5.3.3.1) identifies the
|
roject elements to
which costs will be allocated.
|
.1
|
.2
|
.3
|
.4
|
Cost estimates
|
Work breakdown structure
|
Project schedule
|
Risk management plan
|
.1
|
Cost budgeting
|
tools and techniques
|
.1
|
Cost baseline
|
Inputs
|
Tools & Techniques
|
Outputs
|
.
|
3
|
Project schedule.
|
The
project schedule (described in Section 6.4.3.1) includes
|
planned
start and expected finish dates for the project components to which costs
|
will
be allocated. This information is needed to assign costs to the time period
|
when the cost will be
incurred.
|
.
|
4
|
Risk management plan.
|
The
risk management plan is discussed in Section 11.1.3.
|
In
addition to this, the risk management plan often includes cost contingency,
|
which can be determined
on the basis of the expected accuracy of the estimate.
|
7.3.2 Tools and Techniques for
Cost Budgeting
|
.
|
1
|
Cost budgeting tools and techniques.
|
The tools and
techniques described in Sec-
|
tion 7.2.2 for
developing project cost estimates are used to develop budgets for
|
activities or work
packages as well.
|
7.3.3 Outputs from Cost
Budgeting
|
.
|
1
|
Cost baseline.
|
The
cost baseline is a time-phased budget that will be used to
|
measure
and monitor cost performance on the project. It is developed by sum-
|
ming
estimated costs by period and is usually displayed in the form of an S-curve,
|
as illustrated in Figure 7-2 .
|
Many
projects, especially larger ones, may have multiple cost baselines to
|
measure different
aspects of cost performance. For example, a spending plan or
|
cash-flow forecast is a
cost baseline for measuring disbursements.
|
7.4 COST CONTROL
|
Cost control is
concerned with a) influencing the factors that create changes to
|
the
cost baseline to ensure that changes are agreed upon, b) determining that the
|
cost
baseline has changed, and c) managing the actual changes when and as they
|
occur. Cost control
includes:
|
Figure 7–2.
|
Illustrative Cost Baseline Display
|
Time
|
Expected
|
Cash
|
Flow
|
Cost
|
Baseline
|
Cumulative
|
Values
|
ٱ
|
Monitoring cost
performance to detect and understand variances from plan.
|
ٱ
|
Ensuring
that all appropriate changes are recorded accurately in the cost
|
baseline.
|
ٱ
|
Preventing
incorrect, inappropriate, or unauthorized changes from being
|
included in the cost
baseline.
|
ٱ
|
Informing appropriate
stakeholders of authorized changes.
|
ٱ
|
Acting to bring
expected costs within acceptable limits.
|
Cost control includes
searching out the “whys” of both positive and negative
|
variances.
It must be thoroughly integrated with the other control processes
|
(scope
change control, schedule control, quality control, and others, as discussed
|
in
Section 4.3). For example, inappropriate responses to cost variances can
cause
|
quality
or schedule problems, or produce an unacceptable level of risk later in the
|
project.
|
7.4.1 Inputs to Cost Control
|
.
|
1
|
Cost baseline.
|
The cost baseline is
described in Section 7.3.3.1.
|
.
|
2
|
Performance reports.
|
Performance
reports (discussed in Section 10.3.3.1) provide
|
information
on project scope and cost performance, such as which budgets have
|
been met and which have
not. Performance reports may also alert the project
|
team
to issues that may cause problems in the future.
|
.
|
3
|
Change requests.
|
Change
requests may occur in many forms—oral or written,
|
direct
or indirect, externally or internally initiated, and legally mandated or
|
optional.
Changes may require increasing the budget or may allow decreasing it.
|
.
|
4
|
Cost management plan.
|
The
cost management plan is described in Section 7.2.3.3.
|
7.4.2 Tools and Techniques for
Cost Control
|
.
|
1
|
Cost change control system.
|
A
cost change control system defines the procedures
|
by which the cost
baseline may be changed. It includes the paperwork, tracking
|
systems,
and approval levels necessary for authorizing changes. The cost change
|
control system should
be integrated with the integrated change control system,
|
discussed in Section
4.3.
|
.
|
2
|
Performance measurement.
|
Performance
measurement techniques, described in
|
Section
10.3.2, help to assess the magnitude of any variations that do occur. Earned
|
Value
Management (EVM), described in Sections 7.4.2.3 and 10.3.2.4, is especially
|
useful for cost
control. An important part of cost control is to determine what is
|
causing
the variance and to decide if the variance requires corrective action.
|
.1
|
.2
|
.3
|
.4
|
Cost baseline
|
Performance reports
|
Change requests
|
Cost management plan
|
.1
|
.2
|
.3
|
.4
|
.5
|
Cost change control
|
system
|
Performance measurement
|
Earned value management
|
(EVM)
|
Additional planning
|
Computerized tools
|
.1
|
.2
|
.3
|
.4
|
.5
|
.6
|
Revised cost estimates
|
Budget updates
|
Corrective action
|
Estimate at completion
|
Project closeout
|
Lessons learned
|
Inputs
|
Tools & Techniques
|
Outputs
|
.
|
3
|
Earned value management (EVM).
|
All EVM Control Account
Plans (CAPs) must
|
continuously
measure project performance by relating three independent vari-
|
ables:
1) The Planned Value, the physical work scheduled to be performed,
|
including
the estimated value of this work (previously called the Budgeted Costs
|
for
Work Scheduled [BCWS]), as compared against the 2) The Earned Value,
|
physical work actually
accomplished, including the estimated value of this work
|
(previously called the
Budgeted Costs for Work Performed [BCWP]), and to the
|
3) Actual Costs
incurred to accomplish the Earned Value. The relationship of 2)
|
Earned Value less 1)
Planned Value constitutes the Schedule Variance (SV). The
|
relationship
of 2) Earned Value less 3) Actual Costs constitutes the Cost Variance
|
(CV) for the project.
See also Section 10.3.2.4.
|
.
|
4
|
Additional planning.
|
Few
projects run exactly according to plan. Prospective changes
|
may
require new or revised cost estimates or analysis of alternative approaches.
|
.
|
5
|
Computerized tools.
|
Computerized tools,
such as project management software
|
and spreadsheets, are
often used to track planned costs versus actual costs, and
|
to forecast the effects
of cost changes.
|
7.4.3 Outputs from Cost Control
|
.
|
1
|
Revised cost estimates.
|
Revised
cost estimates are modifications to the cost
|
information used to
manage the project. Appropriate stakeholders must be noti-
|
fied
as needed. Revised cost estimates may or may not require adjustments to
|
other aspects of the project
plan.
|
.
|
2
|
Budget updates.
|
Budget
updates are a special category of revised cost estimates.
|
Budget updates are
changes to an approved cost baseline. These numbers are gen-
|
erally
revised only in response to scope changes. In some cases, cost variances
|
may
be so severe that rebaselining is needed to provide a realistic measure of
|
performance.
|
.
|
3
|
Corrective action.
|
Corrective
action is anything done to bring expected future
|
project performance in
line with the project plan.
|
.
|
4
|
Estimate at completion.
|
An Estimate at
Completion (EAC) is a forecast of most
|
likely
total project costs based on project performance and risk quantification,
|
described in Section
11.4.3. The most common forecasting techniques are some
|
variation of:
|
ٱ
|
EAC
= Actuals to date plus a new estimate for all remaining work. This
|
approach
is most often used when past performance shows that the original
|
estimating
assumptions were fundamentally flawed, or that they are no longer
|
relevant to a change in
conditions. Formula: EAC = AC + ETC.
|
ٱ
|
EAC
= Actuals to date plus remaining budget (BAC – EV). This approach is
|
most
often used when current variances are seen as atypical and the project
|
management
team expectations are that similar variances will not occur in the
|
future. Formula: EAC =
AC + BAC – EV.
|
ٱ
|
EAC
= Actuals to date plus the remaining project budget (BAC – EV) modified
|
by a performance
factor, often the cumulative cost performance index (CPI).
|
This
approach is most often used when current variances are seen as typical
|
of future variances.
Formula: EAC = (AC + (BAC – EV)/CPI)—this CPI is the
|
cumulative CPI.
|
Each
of these approaches may be the correct approach for any given project
|
and
will provide the project management team with a signal if the EAC forecasts
|
go beyond acceptable
tolerances.
|
.
|
5
|
Project closeout.
|
Processes
and procedures should be developed for the closing or
|
canceling
of projects. For example, the Statement of Position (SOP 98-1 issued by
|
the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants—AICPA) requires that all
|
the
costs for a failed information technology project be written off in the
quarter
|
that
the project is canceled.
|
.
|
6
|
Lessons learned.
|
The
causes of variances, the reasoning behind the corrective
|
action
chosen, and other types of lessons learned from cost control should be
|
documented
so that they become part of the historical database for both this
|
project and other
projects of the performing organization (see Section 4.3.3.3).
|
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar